(Columbus, Ohio, December 21, 2016) Today, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled in favor of death row prisoner Tyrone Noling, clearing the way for Mr. Noling’s pursuit of DNA testing and results to prove his innocence. At issue in Ohio v. Noling was a state law allowing non-capital defendants to appeal denials of requested DNA testing, while denying death row prisoners the same process.
The Ohio Supreme Court found that the state law violated the due process and equal protection rights of death row prisoners as well as the constitutional prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment, stating: “Of all cases that cry out for certainty, it is cases that result in the extinguishing of a human life.” (p. 8)
The Court will now hear the merits of Tyrone Noling’s appeal from the order denying his application for DNA testing. Today’s opinion can be accessed here: http://bit.ly/2h1FawK
“The Ohio Supreme Court took a much-needed step towards ensuring that all of Ohio’s prisoners receive appellate review when their requests for DNA testing are denied. DNA testing has been responsible for 10 of Ohio’s 56 exonerations and it is a critical tool for Tyrone Noling, who has already served over twenty years on death row for a crime he did not commit,” said Carrie Wood, attorney for Mr. Noling and Assistant State Public Defender, Office of the Ohio Public Defender.
“Mr. Noling continues to seek DNA testing of key evidence, access to the national ballistics database, as well as results of DNA testing in his case which the state has refused to release. Our hope is Mr. Noling will be granted access to the information and testing needed to resolve his case fairly,” Ms. Wood said.
Despite maintaining his innocence before, during, and since his trial, Tyrone Noling has been on death row for over 20 years for two murders he did not commit. In 1996, Mr. Noling was sentenced to death for the murders of Bearnhardt and Cora Hartig in rural Portage County, Ohio. Today, he remains on death row in danger of execution despite overwhelming evidence of innocence, including:
- There is absolutely no physical evidence tying Mr. Noling to the murders;
- All of the principal witnesses against Mr. Noling have recanted their testimony; and
- Recently discovered forensic and witness evidence withheld at Mr. Noling’s trial points to other viable suspects.
In April 1990, Cora and Bearnhardt Hartig were tragically shot to death in their home in Atwater, Ohio. Neither Mr. Noling’s fingerprints, nor those of his alleged accomplices, were found in the Hartig home, despite uncontroverted evidence that the perpetrator touched many items and ransacked the home. Primitive DNA analysis of a cigarette butt found at the crime scene excluded Mr. Noling and his alleged accomplices. No eyewitnesses placed Mr. Noling or his young friends at the scene of the crime.
The lack of evidence led then-Portage County Sherriff Kenneth P. Howe to discard Mr. Noling and the other youths as viable suspects, saying “It just didn’t fit.”
That the boys even became suspects is puzzling. The police had absolutely no physical evidence from the crime scene pointing to any of them. The only thing that the police did have was the fact that in early April 1990, Mr. Noling and his friends were involved in a handful of minor thefts and two bumbling home robberies, including one in which Mr. Noling accidentally discharged a .25 caliber gun. This gun that did not match the Hartig murder weapon. Not only did these crimes take place in another town miles away, they were strikingly different in nature from the cold-blooded murders of the Hartigs.
Statements of the three young witnesses were obtained by an investigator and used to build a case against Mr. Noling. However, evidence developed since trial indicates that the statements of these witnesses were produced through coercive interrogation tactics and possess indicia of false confession. Experts have found that these statements “should be classified as unreliable.” [http://bit.ly/1rag5Fw] [http://bit.ly/23GZdHr]
Despite the troublesome doubt about the reliability of Mr. Noling’s conviction, he has yet to receive a hearing on the merits of his innocence claims.
Legal Posture of Mr. Noling’s case:
For many years, Mr. Noling has been litigating for DNA testing and results which would prove his innocence. More information about the extensive litigation history is available here: http://www.tyronenoling.com/case-history.
The Ohio Supreme Court’s recent ruling clears the way for it to consider granting the following, which Mr. Noling currently seeks:
- All results of post-conviction DNA testing;
- For the shell casings from the murder weapon to be run through the federal database in order to see if the murder weapon is linked to other crimes or a specific perpetrator;
- To direct the trial court to make findings when it selects a lab to perform DNA testing, and order that those findings must consider whether the lab has the most modern scientific methods of analysis and testing for Mr. Noling’s case.
- For an appropriately selected lab to make the scientific determinations listed in Ohio’s DNA testing statute based on scientific testing rather than subjective and untested observations.
Key Legal Filings in Mr. Noling’s Case
The Memorandum in Support of Jurisdiction of Appellant Tyrone Noling addresses issues related to Mr. Noling’s request for DNA testing, access to the national ballistics database, and his request for the results of previously conducted DNA testing, which can be accessed here: http://bit.ly/1qT78jx
For more information about the evidence of innocence, read an executive summary of the case. http://www.tyronenoling.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/Noling_executive_summary.pdf
A short video about Mr. Noling’s case can be accessed here: https://vimeo.com/193942101